September 6, 2021 – Town of Polk, WI – Mandatory vaccines are against international law…but don’t expect your own government to protect you.
Facts in my editorial relating to Operation Paperclip can be verified in the book titled Operation Paperclip by best-selling author Annie Jacobsen.
“I’m from the government, and I’m here to help”- used to be the common phrase warning people to beware of what their own government is completely inept at. Nowadays it seems people have traded that phrase for the ridiculous belief that their own over powerful Federal government is looking out for their own good.
For me, I am in complete disbelief at how easily the human mind can be swayed and even brainwashed by catch phrases (flatten the curve, it’s for the greater good, etc).
I’m amazed at how easily people can have fact turned to fiction by a “fact checker” because of a grammatical error. I’m both amazed and disgusted at how media has turned from investigative journalists into reporters who blindly read a teleprompter with no thought or question…and I’m amazed at just how similar every newscast is, from local to national. There was a time when people who were critical thinkers were considered leaders in society and not “conspiracy theorists” ( a term invented by the CIA)
Dr. Leopold Alexander helped co-author the research principles known as the Nuremberg Code and the first rule was that “informed voluntary consent was required in absolute terms” These rules are applied in international law to this day. I know that some people will argue that this rule applies to experimenting on human beings without their consent and I agree completely…this vaccine, despite what the federal government wants you to believe, is still in the experimental phase. Our government is using an FDA approval for a name change on the Pfizer vaccine for use in the European Union as a smokescreen to get citizens to trust the vaccine. People need to read the actual approval, it’s still experimental and the earliest it can be approved by the FDA is 2025.
“But my government wouldn’t lie to me,” you might say. Let’s take a look at our own government’s history after WWII.
Starting in May of 1945, the US government brought more than 1600 Nazi scientists into the US to conduct research. This was classified information until 2013 when a freedom of information act request was granted on the terms that all these scientists were now dead.
The book Operation Paperclip focuses on 21 of these scientists. Of those 21, fifteen were decorated members of the Nazi party, eight worked side by side with Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, or Hermann Goring. Six of those men stood trial at Nuremberg with a seventh being mysteriously released. An eighth stood trial in Dachau Germany. One was convicted of mass murder and later hired by US Department of Energy. All of these criminal scientists were brought to the US at the request of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The great Albert Einstein appealed to President Truman to cancel what was dubbed Operation Paperclip.
I could go into deeper detail but I will try to keep it simple. Some of the government organizations that employed these criminals were…
-US Army
-US Air Force
-CIA
-NASA (in fact Kurt Debus,a devoted Nazi, was the first director of NASA’S John F. Kennedy Space Center, Wenher Von Braun and Arthur Rudolph developed the Saturn V rocket based on their knowledge gained inventing the Nazi V-2 rocket that was used to decimate London)
-US Air Force School of Aviation Medicine
-US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine
-Naval Research Institute, Maryland
These Nazi scientists were notorious for using slave labor and conducting experiments on living prisoners at concentration camps. Some of these grotesque experiments included surgery without anesthesia, cold water drowning, death by lethal injection, bacterial poisoning, chemical poisoning, salt water poisoning, and mass extermination.
One might want to argue that these atrocities ended once the criminals became employees of our government but it actually had an opposite effect. Our own government became intrigued with their research (especially the now out of control power hungry CIA, formerly known as the OSS during WWII) and supported the research of the scientists in the controversial fields of weapons of mass destruction and interrogation techniques (the CIA used homeless people and even their own staff unwillingly to experiment with LSD and other psychotic drugs to induce amnesia after interrogation) The US Army used their own soldiers unwillingly to conduct research into biological warfare, nuclear “flashblindedness,” nuclear fallout, nuclear blast survival, and chemical warfare. When John F Kennedy was elected president he realized how over powerful the CIA had become and argued for it to be disbanded. His brother Robert was attorney general at the time and agreed, well history knows what happened to them.
My point is a simple one. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” should be looked at from a suspicious and objective viewpoint. I urge you to open a book and research exactly what your own government is telling you to inject into your body and next time the highest paid government employee government gets on his stepstool at the podium and tells you to “wear a mask, don’t wear a mask, wear a cloth mask, wear two masks, stay 3′ apart, stay 6′ apart, get the vaccine, get the boosters now, don’t try boosting your immune system, don’t try anything your doctor prescribes that isn’t what the government prescribed” you might want to reconsider just what kind of advice you are being given.
In conclusion, employers who mandate experimental vaccines as a term of employment violate the Nuremberg Code and will be tried in international court. This is nothing more than experimenting on human beings without consent and will be prosecuted as such. Some day I hope these employers, our own government, as well as the nefarious criminals behind this virus all face an international court and receive just punishment. Put down your phones, turn off the propaganda news and open a book, before it’s too late.
Michael S Flanders
Town of Polk
Please also note:
COMMENTING
WCI COMMENTING RULES OF ETIQUETTE: While open and honest debate is encouraged here, Washington County Insider asks that you comply with the following rules for posting. Those who do not comply will have their posts removed and may result in being banned from commenting.
In an effort to provide a great experience and be welcoming to everyone, Washington County Insider will not publish comments and reserves the right to remove posts on social media/Facebook that don’t adhere to the guidelines below.
- Are considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others. This is known as “trolling.” Trollers know when they are trolling, and so do we. *See definition of “troll” below. If you notice a few consistent blog trolls disappear, you’ll know why.
- Are sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable.
- Contains inappropriate or vulgar language that is likely to offend.
- Break the law or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes breach of copyright, defamation and contempt of court.
- Advertise products or services for profit.
- Are seen to impersonate someone else.
- Repeatedly post the same or similar messages (‘spam’)
- Include personal contact details such as telephone numbers and postal or email addresses.
- Include a link or photo that has not been approved by the editor prior to posting.
- Are considered campaigning. See also “trolling” above.
- Are unrelated to the topic.
NOTES:
- Just because your comment doesn’t show up right away doesn’t mean you’re being censored. When you post a comment it must first go through our filtering software. If it fails, your comment goes into a queue for manual approval.
- Just because a comment or advertisement is on the site, doesn’t mean WCI endorses it.
- The above rules are not intended to stop criticism or dissenters, but rather to stop those who are incapable of participating in a civilized manner.
*Trolling: a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readrs into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement. (source: Wikipedia)