October 9, 2022 – West Bend, WI – I back the badge, but I’m voting “No” on the Anti-Crime Referendum this November 8. Here’s why:
* Public safety represents the main function of government.
Why would I vote to permanently increase my own and my neighbors’ property taxes (nearly 10% annually), when our elected officials should already prioritize around law enforcement resources?
I believe they are aware of this responsibility. When asked what would happen if the referendum doesn’t pass, our County Executive reportedly said, “We keep doing what we’re doing. Can we move some things around, 100%.”
I have confidence in elected officials like Supervisor Brian Gallitz who also acknowledged, “I believe we can handle this within our normal operating budget.”
* I tend to pause whenever I hear phrases like, “people can afford this” or, “it’s less than $15/month for most people.” Tax increases should never be taken lightly.
It is not the job of our public servants to define what amount is “affordable.” With the current economic conditions that are not expected to improve any time soon, I would argue that any cent of increased taxes is likely “unaffordable” to many elderly neighbors and others with fixed incomes.
* Scare tactics get old. Yes, I believe crime is getting worse. However, I’m certain that if this referendum passes and our taxes are perpetually raised; the problem doesn’t instantly disappear.
I recently read a quote from County Executive Josh Schoemann that said, “The question is what you hate more, growing government or growing crime?” I hate both, which is why I’m voting “No” on the Anti-Crime Referendum in order to remind my current government to work within its budget.
I’m confident that our elected officials will find a way to increase law enforcement resources, without raising taxes on the voters that elected them.
Sue True
West Bend, Wi
_______________________________________________________________
Please also note:
COMMENTING
WASHINGTONCOUNTYINSIDER.COM (WCI) COMMENTING RULES OF ETIQUETTE: While open and honest debate is encouraged here, Washington County Insider asks that you comply with the following rules for posting. Those who do not comply will have their posts removed and may result in being banned from commenting.
In an effort to provide a great experience and be welcoming to everyone, Washington County Insider will not publish comments and reserves the right to remove posts on social media/Facebook that doesn’t adhere to the guidelines below.
- Are considered likely to provoke, attack or offend others. This is known as “trolling.” Trollers know when they are trolling, and so do we. *See the definition of “troll” below. If you notice a few consistent blog trolls disappear, you’ll know why.
- Are sexually explicit, abusive, or otherwise objectionable.
- Contains inappropriate or vulgar language that is likely to offend.
- Break the law or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes breach of copyright, defamation, and contempt of court.
- Advertise products or services for profit.
- Are seen impersonating someone else.
- Repeatedly post the same or similar messages (‘spam’)
- Include personal contact details such as telephone numbers and postal or email addresses.
- Include a link or photo that has not been approved by the editor prior to posting.
- Are considered campaigning. See also “trolling” above.
- Are unrelated to the topic.
NOTES:
- Just because your comment doesn’t show up right away doesn’t mean you’re being censored. When you post a comment it must first go through our filtering software. If it fails, your comment goes into a queue for manual approval.
- Just because a comment or advertisement is on the site, doesn’t mean WCI endorses it.
- The above rules are not intended to stop criticism or dissenters, but rather to stop those who are incapable of participating in a civilized manner.
*Trolling: a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement. (source: Wikipedia)